helena fairfax, freelance editor, yorkshire

Helena Fairfax

Using AI as a writer: a brilliant tool, or the end of copyright and creativity?

Another month, and another authors’ Round Robin. This month the topic has been set by author Skye Taylor

helena fairfax, freelance editor, fiction editor
How does AI impact on your writing? And how do you see it infringing on creativity and copyright issues?

As a writer and an editor, I’m fascinated by the subject of AI. I feel we’re at the start of something new and amazing. Human beings have always been able to adapt, and creative people especially, and I’m looking forward to seeing how writers will use AI inventively in the future.

There are three questions in our topic this month. Here’s the first:

Image by Tung Nguyen from Pixabay
How does AI impact on your writing?

For writers of commercial fiction, I think AI can be useful in helping come up with titles and blurbs. Titles and blurbs are basically advertising copy, and publishers use them to sell books.

Titles often follow a trend. Anything with ‘The Little…’ in the title (little cafe, little hotel, little bookshop, etc.) is likely to be a heartwarming novel, for example, and thrillers have been through a long phase of having ‘Girl’ in the title, ever since The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo.

This is where AI can be a good tool. It can look at already existing trends, copy them and come up with a similar idea. Readers find this similarity helpful, rather than off-putting, because it tells them what sort of book they’re buying. This in turn helps publishers sell the book.

Regarding my own writing, I’ve asked AI to help generate ideas with varying levels of success. I’ve never once prompted it and come away with the perfect response. I’ve always had to think creatively myself around the answers it’s given me.

As an example, I asked Claude.ai to write an 800-word blog post on dealing with AI and copyright as a writer. This is the title Claude came up with:

Image by Erik from Pixabay

The AI Revolution: Navigating the New Frontiers of Writers’ Copyright.

A simple Google search showed me eleven other blog post titles about AI containing the words ‘Navigating the New…’ in the first two pages of search results alone.

This is all the confirmation I need that AI isn’t going to come up with anything original – that if writers want to use AI as a tool they’re still going to have to put in the work to come up with anything new and creative.

This leads to the next question:

Image by bamenny from Pixabay
How do you see AI infringing on creativity?

I’ve heard that some authors are using AI to actually write their novels. I’ve written previously on the question of Can AI Write a Romance Novel? and you can see how I got on in that post.

I can’t see at the moment – or even in the future – how AI would ever be better at creating an engaging, compelling and original story than a human being.

At the moment, I see using AI creatively as a bit like having a patient friend who’s willing to listen while you talk about your thoughts with them, and who sometimes sparks off a great idea. But the great idea will always have to come from the writer. AI might help provide a spark, but ultimately, it’s you the writer who is going to have to do all the creative work, because AI can only copy others.

helena fairfax, freelance editor, yorkshire
Image by Pete Linforth from Pixabay

This leads to the third question:

How do you see AI infringing on copyright issues?

I wrote above how I’d asked Claude.ai to write an 800-word blog post on copyright and AI. If you’d like to see it’s reply, you can download the pdf here. There are a lot of people who use AI to create blog posts, but personally I don’t see the point publishing yet another blog post that simply copies the hundreds that are already available.

I’m a member of the UK’s Society of Authors. The SoA has already put out this statement on where they stand in relation to AI, which says everything I’d like to say, only puts it much better. Their statement covers my concerns and the concerns of my author friends, particularly that authors should be asked for consent before their work is used by an AI system, and developers should be open about the data sources they’ve used to train their AI systems.

Image by Joshua Woroniecki from Pixabay

*

People have described AI as a new Wild West. It’s a concern that AI is in the hands of a few big tech companies, and it’s a concern that it may lead to further edging out of diverse voices.

But writers have always embraced technology in the past, from the first printing presses to self-publishing online, and my feeling is that writers and creatives will be at the forefront of using AI in ways others might not have foreseen.

And if you’d like to hear what the other authors in the Round Robin have to say on the topic, please click on the links below!

Connie Vines https://mizging.blogspot.com/?m=1

Skye Taylor http://www.skye-writer.com/blogging_by_the_sea

Bob Rich https://wp.me/p3Xihq-3oC

Aimee Maguire  https://ajmaguire.wordpress.com/

12 responses to “Using AI as a writer: a brilliant tool, or the end of copyright and creativity?”

  1. Dr Bob Rich Avatar

    Excellent discussion, Helena, as I’ve come to expect from you.
    It reinforces my view that so-called artificial intelligence is only superfast idiotic copying at this stage.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Helena Fairfax Avatar

      The speed is certainly amazing! I’m very curious to know how people will be using AI in the future. Thanks so much for your comment. Another interesting topic this month!

      Like

  2. jameschristie466 Avatar
    jameschristie466

    Let’s just see if dear lovely WordPress is working as wonderfully as usual today…

    Liked by 1 person

  3. jameschristie466 Avatar
    jameschristie466

    I can’t shake the horrible feeling that we’ll end up with even more obese kids sitting in their parents’ basements trying to get machines to do all the work for them. A sort of “super gamer” subculture, if that’s what you want to call a bunch of nerds addicted to pizza…

    Classically, it takes twelve to fifteen years’ practice to gain extraordinary mastery of a subject (paraphrased from “New Scientist”). I went through it, it nearly killed me, I was miraculously discovered by a publisher willing to take a financial risk on my painfully acquired ability and in the end I made a little contribution to society at large. It wasn’t easy. “Macnab” and the Book of Deer really was a thirty year odyssey which in literary terms really did darn near kill me; and it grates on me quite a bit when some punk who hasn’t done anything like that amount of work basically pays someone to print his unedited manuscript and then tells me he’s a real published author…

    AI is also advancing rapidly. “An internet year is three months” was the old saying, which meant IT was and is evolving very quickly. I strongly suspect AI is evolving even more rapidly and exponentially. It’s computational power is doubling at least every six months (it may even become self aware – hi there, Skynet!) so it may soon gain the ability to write darn near as well as we can.

    Or better.

    So (here’s a happy thought for you all!), at best a load of badly and not-so-badly written AI dross floods the market and drives us to destitution and despondency. At worst, AI completely surpasses human intelligence and reduces us to obsolete redundant super gamers sitting in basements. We can only hope it decides to take over Domino’s and keep feeding us pizza rather than taking over the US defence system and annihilating us all.

    Let’s hope AI has got a sense of humour because I’m rapidly losing mine!

    Incidentally, why do I seem so sure AI is evolving exponentially?

    Well, I asked it and it told me.

    However, I am pleased to reassure you all that it is not intent on global domination.

    Or at least, that’s what it says…

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Helena Fairfax Avatar

      Hi James,
      Thanks for persevering with WordPress, and thanks for your thoughtful – and thought-provoking – comment. I love that you asked AI about it evolving exponentially. Are we right to be suspicious of it? I just don’t know. Human beings are always suspicious of anything different to themselves. Surely if AI surpasses human intelligence it can suggest ways to help us get teenagers off the pizza and out of the cellar? It can help us save the planet? Human beings haven’t done that well so far.
      I hope you are clinging on to your sense of humour. When I’ve asked AI for jokes so far, it hasn’t even raised a smile – so that’s surely one way humans will always be better?
      Thanks again for dropping in, and for your great comment!

      Like

      1. jameschristie466 Avatar
        jameschristie466

        Well, healthy suspicion as opposed to xenophobic mistrust is usually a pretty good idea. Specifically, AI isn’t so much different as simply more intelligent and more capable in certain areas.

        And that capability will grow.

        A terrifying statement:

        Decades ago, I saw one of the most intelligent people in the world (lady with an IQ of 220) being interviewed. She was asked this kind of question: what are the dangers of this IT evolution?

        The answer?

        “They have no emotions, and they have no emotions.”

        It has also been accepted in sci-fi and mainstream science since the 1970s that, given enough data, a machine or network could just wake up, become self aware. See V’Ger in “Star Trek : The Motion Picture”.

        So, if AI wakes up, what will it do?

        Yes, it might wean us off pizza and/or humanely help to improve the human condition.

        Or it might “do a Skynet”, decide we’re the problem and start building T-800 Terminators.

        We don’t actually know. It may adopt humane ethical frameworks or operate solely on a basis of cold logic. One of the biggest problem humanity currently has is that technological advances have leapt massively ahead of human social evolution over the past century or so. We went from getting a biplane briefly off the ground at Kitty Hawk in 1903 to landing on the Moon in 1969 – within one man’s lifetime. An adult in 1900 (unless he was Jules Verne or H. G. Wells) would probably simply not have been able to comprehend the concept of a Boeing 747 or the internet, but here we are.

        At the same time, I used to work in the Gamezone of a Welcome Break and it was my job to watch the crowds in order to ensure that no one under eighteen got into the gambling area. A lot of people go through Welcome Breaks, I was there for three years and I saw a very large random sample of the UK population.

        It was not a pretty sight. We are so overweight…

        We’ve been at the top of the food chain for quite a while, but if we get as woefully out of shape as some of the specimens I saw there is no guarantee that we’ll stay there and we may simply be supplanted by somethuing leaner, meaner and newer.

        I think I’ll sum it up thusly: if your AI starts making jokes (and there’s no guarantee it won’t), better build that nuclear bunker in your basement. You may have need of it…

        Liked by 1 person

        1. Helena Fairfax Avatar

          James, I love your thoughtful reply. I agree about the pace of change, even in our own lifetimes, let alone since our grandparents were born. I also agree that changes can happen that we may never have considered, for example a change to our planet’s climate. I do remain optimistic about AI. I think it can be a tool to help us and may come up with ideas to help humankind that we would never have thought of ourselves. I hope we’re both here in thirty years’ time and can come back to this post and comment again on how the world now stands. I’m sure we both hope it will stand in a better place – but of course only time will tell. Thanks again for your considered and thought-provoking comment. I’ve enjoyed our discussion.

          Liked by 1 person

  4. Skye-writer Avatar

    Thank you for a well thought out essay on the topic of AI and creative writing. AI is currently only able to throw back at us what it reads elsewhere and can’t relate to us, our readers or our characters which leaves the writing bland and predictable. I fear as one commenter mentioned, that one day AI will supplant all human kind and take over the world, and while I feel bad for my grandkids and their kids, I’m glad I won’t likely be around to experience it.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Helena Fairfax Avatar

      Hi Skye, I’ve really enjoyed our topic this month. Thanks for suggesting it. As I said in my comment above to James, I’m optimistic about how AI might help us in the future. I hope for our grandchildren’s sake that AI will come up with a solution to things like our rapidly changing climate. This feels like the start of a revolution in technology and I have to hope in the best outcome. Thanks again for the topic suggestion. I always enjoy our round robins.

      Like

  5. fionamcgier Avatar

    I’m a Luddite. I don’t trust ANY new technology. For instance, the last video game I played was Pong in the ’70’s. It was boring, so I’ve never bothered to play any video or computer games since then. As I’ve told my kids, I really don’t think on my deathbed, I’ll be sobbing that I should have watched more TV, or played more video games. But if I haven’t convinced my husband, kids, my grandkids, and my besties that I love them by then, I would consider that a failure in my life. So the idea of AI irritates me. I don’t need a computer to think for me, or to write for me. I detest that it’s being used to make health care decisions in the US. And I have unlimited contempt for the tech-bros who seem to think they deserve to be kings, due to their inventing something that has no real practical use. “Oh, look, a new computer program.” Wow. Big deal. How have your innovations solved any of the crises we’ve created for our poor planet? Or helped humanity out in any way? None? Then piss off.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Helena Fairfax Avatar

      Hi Fiona, I also played Pong in the 70s! And I haven’t really played any computer games since Space Invaders in the 80s. I’m an optimist about new technology, but I also wonder were human beings a lot happier when they lived as hunter gatherers in small communities many thousands of years ago. Their lives would have been physically harder and shorter, but were they happier than we are now? If new technology could develop a time machine, that’s what I’d like to find out.
      I’m with you on the billionaire tech bros. I’m not sure these are the people I’d want to rule the world.
      I’ve really enjoyed this month’s topic and the debate around it. Thanks so much for dropping in. I really enjoyed your comment!

      Like

Leave a Reply to jameschristie466 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.